You acknowledge Mr Gomez that the work of television, radio and newspapers (mainly Millennium Chronicle) is unfortunate and function as de facto censorship. Although broken, because censorship is real and permanent Macondo, I heard the interview that Luis Mandoki granted him on 15 November. 
comfortable refuge in his radio program and now in the comfort of your newspaper column, a critique of the work Luis Mandoki, however, is nothing but a string of rants and outbursts. Finally, the adjectives just the result of hysterical discourse has attempted to see López Obrador a scapegoat. The "easy way" to impose their views is to interrupt the interviewee, not let him speak, or not to publish their replies and views. The hard way is to talk, and it is sometimes necessary to remain silent. You do not do Mr. Gomez is a good talker. Make analysis of a work takes effort, requires work, not enough to write that is dedicated to "repeat dogma by dogma, commandment by commandment." Lord Gómez, make a list of alleged dogmas and assumptions commandments. List them first and then find references in the documentary by Luis Mandoki. If it does and what you write is baseless.
Suddenly able
miracle soap opera-like-to examine the language of film, compares the work of Mandoki and Leni Riefenstahl. His comparison is insignificant. In the whole word: insignificant. Riefenstahl's work as much of the work of Goya or Phidias, was hired by a ruler, the work of Mandoki, no. The filmmaker has made this film because he wants to show those Mexicans anonymous violated their rights have been civilians (particularly the right to vote and be certain of the vote), thus Mandoki shows a concept of humanity much broader than that of companies where you work and do not allow "divergent views". 
Oblivious to the arts and any type of art you ignore that, for example, in commemoration of the September 11 attacks in 2004 were used visual elements that originate in the architecture of Albert Speer. Mankind has used since time immemorial artistic elements to express his political views. Caral, Ek Balam, Stonehenge, the column of Trajan, the tomb of Qin Shi Huang are some examples. What is your goal by associating the word "Furer" the documentary by Luis Mandoki?, want to discredit the filmmaker?, do you think Luis Mandoki defends the political ideology of Nazism?. Perhaps his comments are for anyone to see the movie FRAUD 2006. That it the "pastor" tells the radio that "good people" what to see and hear. Congratulations Mr. Gomez, you are a judgmental business. The images are:
http://rexcurry.net/swastika-sex-girls-nudity-porn-xxx.html
http://www.bridgeandtunnelclub.com/bigmap/ citywide / tributeinlight / index.htm
http://www.elrelojdesol.com/museo-del-prado/pages/GOYA---LA-FAMILIA-DE-CARLOS-IV.htm
http://www.arquitecturaviva.com/Noticias. asp
0 comments:
Post a Comment