Although lately I'm very involved in other activities, now give me some time to put on the table to ... call it speaker, Alberto Aguilar.
(I'll write style critic of López Obrador strawberry) "This man", spent a short paragraph in his column in El Universal Names, names, y. .. names of Jan. 22 says:
MVS BUT OF Joaquín Vargas José Gutierrez Vivo negotiated his return to Channel 52 on pay tv, I can confirm that there was a good arrangement, so that the communicator will be maintained only radio. Certainly the financial problems continue to monitor and a new notice of strike due to delays in payroll.next day Jose Gutierrez Vivo took a break from Monitor your news in the morning to clarify some points Aguilar's statements, which basically were
- not negotiated anything, there is a contract and that unless I had read that Aguilar could not confirm that there was a good arrangement.
- The notice of strike is not new and Gutierrez Vivo not have ignored and has been paying little by little to their employees.
The director of Monitor Group, at all times was respectful and just focus on clarifying these points. The publication of this strange comment, saying no gossip, in a column that itself is dedicated to talk about the economy has a purpose: MONITOR IS THE FIRST PLACE IN HEARING ABOUT ALL THE NEWS OF THE RADIO IN MEXICO * and tried to take a cheap shot as usual for Grupo Radio Centro, who incidentally is now sponsoring Aguilar and partner brother of El Universal, so one commenter given financial as naming names, causes and precise numbers fails to mention that these financial problems stem from a million-dollar debt that (to say the same style) Grupo Radio Centro de Francisco Aguirre in flagrant contempt of multiple statements of national and international authorities has decided on his pants, not paying Gutierrez Vivo.
The thing did not stop there, the next day in the same column Aguilar reissued comments about it: I have always respected
Jose Gutierrez Vivo on the radio because his way. Even as you know I worked with him on Monitor though I had to leave because they did not pay. Finally he did. Pity the abrupt addressed to me yesterday in his daily broadcast. I say, I no longer hear that my objectivity was questioned about what we informed him about the failed negotiations with MVS Joaquín Vargas to return to Channel 52. The information is completely accurate, and the threat of a possible new location to strike by the union, since there again delays its workers. Must now four fortnights and half of the bonus and the savings fund in 2007. So the environment of its staff has not changed much. Perhaps that is why his angry mood yesterday I had to suffer just because you tell the truth that he also pursued for a long time as a communicator.
And here comes the most interesting. Aguilar respects Vivo, Vivo has well over 40 years doing what Aguilar has tried for 10 years. He says he had to leave because Gutierrez Vivo Monitor did not pay him yet always clear that yes, I paid ... What purpose and raves? He complains about the abrupt Vivó directed towards him, uta! as if any reply or explanation is going to take as sharp to him, you kbrn. And what does its own abrupt? Then follows, in which "tell", that "no longer hear" wow! A communicator as he hears the most-watched newscast, how is it possible? Worst bit, is guided by what they "tell" With this reasoning we fully understand why the comments of Aguilar, who threw the head alone. Betito
not think you could give us a good analysis of these weevils that you can do about the economy and impact on those companies who break the law? or hit you?
Source: INRA
Kamel Nacif
Is this the change?. What is what has changed?. There that says, needs to be investigated gross, it is changed, should read: an investigation does not investigate, does not ask, do not ask, do not list causes an investigation. An investigation ends exactly where it starts, it tries to leave the blank page and it is worth citing articles, rules and regulations. In this new type of research is more important